THE GEARED SYSTEM AND THE GEAR BOX Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

THE GEARED SYSTEM AND THE GEAR BOX - Coursework Example Theory has it that the larger the gear the less the revolution and the reverse are also true. But can this be explained experimentally? Questions that are of fundamental and the experiment seek answers to are: what is the gear system? What does the gear system entail? And last but not least, what objectives define this experiment? A gear is a common device that is used in transmission of power in engineering. It is an essential component in running of automobiles and machinery (Uicker 67). A geared system includes any system that is toothed and designed for transmission or receiving of motion by means of using successive engaged teeth. The wheel is called the larger wheel where as the pinion is referred to as a smaller gear. A gear is used in engineering situations. It facilitates the rotational speed, the transmission of power (torque) and the direction of output and input shaft. Simpler gear specifications occurs in a gear ratio whereby the ratio of the number of hearing teeth that are the driving gears to the numbers of hearing teeth on the driven gear could be more or less than one. In cases where value of the ratio is more than one, this will lead to a reduced driving rotational speed, and in cases where it is less than one, it could give an increased speed. This experiment seeks to study different gear arrangements and some uses of the gear system. An automotive gear is a gear system that is used in the automotive industry (Uicker 92). This gear gives out a high torque and converts the mechanical energy in a smooth and noiseless way. Turbine gears, on the other hand, are used in minimization of power and noise. Worm gears are gears that are used in driving of the tooth wheel rim that is positioned on the turbines bearing. The objectives set for this experiment was to study different arrangements of gears including worm gearboxes, automobile gear boxes, as well as, turbine reduction gear boxes. Theory. The important specification of the parameters of the g ears includes the number of the gears teeth (z), the circular pitch diameter of the gear (d), and the module (m). The module, m, can, therefore, be given by the following equation; m= d/z, d is the path diameter which could transmit equal motion as that of the actual gear by a pure rolling. The gear ratio or the torque ratio can also be termed as the mechanical advantage. For a basic gear train that has two gears, input gear drives output gear. The teeth of the gear are normally made in a manner that the pitch circles of one gear rolls on another without slipping (Uicker 42). The speed (v) of the contact point of the pitch circles are equal and are given by the following equation; V = r A w A = r B w B, where the input gear (GA) has a radius (r A) and an angular velocity (w A), where as the output gear (GB) has a radius (r B) and angular velocity (w B). The radius of the pitch circle is directly proportional to the number of teeth in gear. This, therefore, implies that the number of teeth’s ratio is equal to the radii’s ratio, that is W A/ w B= r B/ r A = N B/N A. Where N A is the input gear’s total number of teeth where as N B is the output gear’s number of teeth. Therefore, the gear ratio for a basic gear train is equal to; R= w A/ w B = N B/ N A. This equation implies that if the number of teeth in the input gear is smaller than that of the output gear, then the input gear has to go through a faster rotation in comparison with the output gear. Observations. The different types of the gear teeth were observed in the laboratory and their names and diameter recorded in the table shown below. Name of the gear Diameter of the gear(cm) 1st gear 13.50 2nd gear 7.25 3rd

Mendelian Genetics of Drosophila | Lab Report

Mendelian Genetics of Drosophila | Lab Report Joshua Park Introduction Drosophila melanogaster, known generally as a fruit fly, is a cost-effective model organism with certain qualities that make it an ideal research tool in various fields of science. Drosophila melanogaster are preferred over vertebrate models as a research tool in genetic studies due to its basic food requirements, its ability to produce large numbers of progeny in a short period of time, and quick life cycle. Depending on diet and stress its life span ranges up to an average maximum of 120 days. They are also easy and inexpensive to culture in a laboratory environment, not to mention they take up very little space. In addition, they have diverse phenotypic traits that are easily observable. Its anatomical features like the compound eye allow easy access for phenotypic characterization. They also have abundant genetic variation in a relatively small genome. Approximately 13,600 protein-coding genes are located in only four chromosomes. Many heredity variations can be studied in these flies.An example of this is the gene that codes for eye color in Drosophila, which can result in red, sepia, white, or brown phenotypes. This unique ability to generate many different phenotypes provides D. melanogaster its practicality as an effective research tool for the study of the relationship between genotype and phenotype. In this experiment, we wanted to understand which phenotypic results would result from a mating cross between D. melanogaster parents with certain wild type and mutant phenotypes for eye color and wing size. The wild type phenotype for eye color is red, while the mutant phenotypes are sepia and white. The wild type phenotype for wing size is long, while the mutant phenotype is apterous, or no wing. We also wanted to know the reason for such phenotypic ratios, which we hypothesized to be the Mendelian Law of Segregation in regards to the study of one trait. To do this, we mated D. melanogaster flies with similar and different phenotypes in order to see how well our results agreed with the Mendelian Law of Segregation. We created two crosses: a monohybrid cross where both male and female flies had the wild type phenotype (Bb and Bb), and a monohybrid cross where the male flies had the mutant phenotype (XwY) and the female flies had the wild type phenotype (X+X+). For our first monohybr id cross, we wanted to know what the expected phenotypic ratio would be when crossing wildtype red-eyed flies, according to Mendels first law. We hypothesized that the expected phenotypic ratio for a cross with red-eyed flies would be 3:1 because according to the Mendelian Law of Segregation, the two alleles are separated from each other during gamete formation. For our other monohybrid cross, we wanted to know what the expected phenotypic ratio would be when crossing wildtype red-eyed flies with mutant white-eyed flies, once again according to Mendels first law. We hypothesized that the expected phenotypic ratio would be 1:1 due to the Mendelian Law of Segregation. Using the chi-square test, we will be prepared to reject or fail to reject our hypothesis according to our mating cross results. Title: Mendelian Genetics of Drosophila Material and Methods Students in groups of two were given a number corresponding to a specific fly stock vial. Two culture vials pre-filled with food and cotton plugs were collected at the front of the classroom. The group number and initials were written on the vials. Next, the assigned stock vials were obtained and were lightly tapped on the lab bench to remove the flies from the cotton plug. An anesthesia wand was dipped into the FlyNap and carefully inserted through the cotton plugs into each stock vial. The stock vials were immediately placed horizontally on the lab bench after, preventing the flies from drowning in the food media. After waiting a few minutes for the flies to fall asleep, the wands were removed from the vials and the flies from each vial were dumped onto separate index cards. The flies were observed under a dissecting scope and found to be either male or female based on the body morphology. A lamp light was used for an easier inspection. Using a brush, 5 male and female flies from e ach cross set were transferred to the culture vials. Once again, the vials were made sure to be placed horizontally on the lab bench. Each culture vial was sealed with a cotton plug, and the leftover flies were returned to the stock vials. The vials were returned to the TA for storage. Once larva could be seen in the fly culture vials, the parent flies were put to sleep and removed from the vials to avoid backcrossing. Once it was evident that many F1 offspring had matured into adults, the flies were put to sleep and dumped onto notecards. The flies from the assigned cross set were observed under a dissecting microscope, and the eye color and wing presence was recorded for each fly. For cross set E, both the sex and phenotype for each fly was recorded. After every F1 generation fly was counted for each cross set, they were dumped into the morgue. Results Cross Set: C Table 1: F1 phenotypes for cross set C Phenotype Total number Eye color Wing size Red Long 39 Sepia Long 9 The F1 data that was collected for cross set C is indicated in Table 1. The number of flies for each phenotype is shown. Figure 1: Graphical representation of F1 data for cross set C Figure 1 presents the data from Table 1 in the form of a bar graph. According to this data, there were more flies with wildtype red eyes (39) compared to flies with sepia eyes (9). There was a total of 48 flies for cross set C. Cross Set: E Table 2: F1 phenotypes and sex for cross set E       Phenotype Number of Male Flies Number of Female Flies Total number Eye color Wing size Red Long 10 9 19 White Long 10 13 23 The F1 data that was collected for cross set E is indicated in Table 2. The number of flies for each phenotype and sex is shown. Figure 2: Graphical representation of F1 data for cross set E Figure 2 presents the data from Table 2 in the form of a bar graph. According to this data, the number of male flies with wildtype red eyes (10) was equal to the number of male flies with white eyes (10). In addition, the number of female flies with wildtype red eyes (9) was very similar to the number of female flies with white eyes (13). There was a total of 42 flies for cross set E. Phenotype Observed Number (O) Expected Number (E) Deviation (O E) (O E) ² (O E) ²/E Red eyes/long wings 39 36 3 9 0.25 Sepia eye/long wings 9 12 -3 9 0.75 Total 48 48 X ² = 1.00 Chi-Square Analysis: Table 3:Chi-square analysis for cross set C Cross Set C:   à Ã¢â‚¬ ¡2 = Degrees of freedom (df) = 1 p-value range = 0.1 Table 4: Chi-square analysis for cross set E Phenotype Observed Number (O) Expected Number (E) Deviation (O E) (O E) ² (O E) ²/E Red eyes/long wings 19 21 -3 9 0.429 White eyes/long wings 23 21 2 4 0.190 Total 42 42 X ² = 0.619 Cross Set E:   à Ã¢â‚¬ ¡2 = Degrees of freedom (df) = 1 p-value range = 0.1 The chi-square analysis was completed for both crosses to compare the observed results with the expected results. The p-value for cross set C was between 0.1 and 0.9. The p-value for cross set E was also between 0.1 and 0.9. As a result, we fail to reject the null hypothesis of the chi-square test for both crosses. Discussion According to the results of this experiment, our research hypothesis was supported in each mating cross. We hypothesized that the expected phenotypic ratio for a cross with red-eyed wildtype flies would be 3:1, because according to the Mendelian Law of Segregation, the two alleles are separated from each other during gamete formation. Cross set C produced about three times as many red-eyed wildtype flies compared to sepia-eyed flies, confirming our hypothesis. For our other monohybrid cross, we wanted to know what the expected phenotypic ratio would be when crossing wildtype red-eyed flies with mutant white-eyed flies. We hypothesized that the expected phenotypic ratio would be 1:1 due to the Mendelian Law of Segregation. Cross set E produced equal amounts of red-eyed flies and white-eyed flies, confirming our hypothesis. The ratios obtained for cross sets C and E accurately reflected the expected results for a monohybrid cross and test cross respectively, as claimed by Mendels law o f segregation. The results of the chi-square analysis show that the observed counts were very close to the expected counts. The p-values for both cross sets C and E were between 0.1 and 0.9. Since these p-values were larger than 0.05, it was concluded that we should fail to reject the null hypothesis. Failing to reject the null hypothesis means that the observed data was not statistically different from the expected data. The mode of inheritance for cross set C was determined to be complete dominance. In complete dominance, the dominant allele completely masks the effect of the recessive allele when both are present. Since both parents were found to be heterozygous for eye color (Bb), the dominant red allele masked the effect of the recessive sepia allele. The F1 data for cross set C demonstrates that wild type red eyes are dominant over sepia eyes, since the ratio of red-eyed flies (BB or Bb) to sepia-eyed flies (bb) was calculated to be 3:1, as expected for a monohybrid cross according to Mendels law of segregation. The mode of inheritance for cross set E was determined to be X-linked. Genetic conditions with an X-linked recessive inheritance pattern usually affect only the males in a family. This is because they are caused by altered or mutant genes found on the X-chromosome. Females are born with two X-chromosomes, so the effects of a working gene on one can mask the effects of a mutant gene on the other, which is similar to complete dominance. They will normally be unaffected carriers of the condition. Males have only one X-chromosome, so if they inherit one with a mutant gene (XwY), they will be affected. The F1 data for cross set E demonstrates that the traits for red eyes and white eyes are located on the sex chromosome, since the ratio of red-eyed flies to white-eyed flies was determined to be 1:1. This indicated that the red-eyed female flies were heterozygous for eye color (X+Xw), since the contribution of a mutant allele from both parent flies would result in offspring with red eyes an d white eyes in equal proportions. These results are comparable to the data from Thomas Hunt Morgans experiment with D. melanogaster. In his experiment, he discovered a mutant gene affecting eye color. This mutant gene was expressed as a white color in the eyes. Morgan proceeded to discover that the gene for eye color was inherited in different ways depending on the sex of the fly. This difference came from the fact that female flies have two X chromosomes, while male flies only have one X chromosome and a Y chromosome. Morgan found that this gene had a similar inheritance pattern to the X chromosome. Thus, Morgan concluded that this gene was X-linked. A limitation of this experiment is the fact that we only counted progeny during one session. Multiple trials of counting offspring may have produced closer values to the expected ratios of Mendels law of segregation. Another limitation would be the difficulty of identifying male flies from female flies in a quick and efficient manner. This research has demonstrated the practicality and versatility of D. melanogaster as a tool for research in the lab. Although these fruit flies may seem like very simple and insignificant organisms, they allow us to do research that may otherwise not have been possible. I plan to conduct further studies with D. melanogaster in the field of pharmacology. Since humans share key physiological processes with this organism, D. melanogaster would serve as an effective model for drug discovery. I aim to generate a new drug compound that would greatly aid in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. I hope that the research conducted with these flies will allow for greater discoveries in various fields of science that will contribute to the advancement of mankind. References Jennings, B. H. (2011). Drosophila a versatile model in biology medicine. Materials Today,  14(5), 190-195. doi:10.1016/s1369-7021(11)70113-4 Morgan, T. H. (1910). Sex Limited Inheritance In Drosophila. Science, 32(812), 120-122.  doi:10.1126/science.32.812.120 Pandey, U. B., Nichols, C. D. (2011). Human Disease Models in Drosophila melanogaster and  the Role of the Fly in Therapeutic Drug Discovery. Pharmacological Reviews, 63(2),  411-436. http://doi.org/10.1124/pr.110.003293 Prà ¼ÃƒÅ¸ing, K., Voigt, A., Schulz, J. B. (2013). Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism for  Alzheimers disease. Molecular Neurodegeneration, 8, 35. http://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1326-8-35     Ã‚   Plagiarism: Types, Causes and Effects Plagiarism: Types, Causes and Effects KENNEDY MULI KAILITI PLAGIARISM Introduction Plagiarism is ideological theft. When a person takes and idea that is not their own and represents it for credit. This is a false representation of oneself by using work or an idea that is not original or stolen from another person. Furthermore different constituencies have different meaning for the history of plagiarism. We might helpfully regard it as a triple entity or triangle. At one point of the triangle is cheating involving written works, the second inadvertent a failure to master conventions and the third are professionals who another work without permission for their own benefit.[1] This is just taking advantage of other peoples creativity without acknowledging them. Plagiarism represents truth without representing the source of the truth so ultimately it becomes its truth from the wrong person. When plagiarism is done without intention, knowledge or as a mistake then its called miss-use of sources. The great controversy on plagiarism is drawing the thin line between the de liberate and mistake and who takes responsibility between the teacher and the student. Plagiarism has been there as long as man existed and there was art and creativity but the realization of the vice and its consequences could have come with the printing press and academic advancement. In the early years of human existence philosophy, music and poetry were the ideologies and their practice as a sign of civilization and social advancement. The mode of education was informal and there was not based on research and writing and though plagiarism was practiced there is no data on who and when it started. In the definition and practice plagiarism was practiced as long as man lived. As people put their ideas and creativity in writing, distribution, business and credit then plagiarism became a parallel business. The publishing and printing companies and the authors had to protect themselves from theft and so the copy right protection laws. The twentieth century has come with innovation, scientific discoveries and research and plagiarism has risen as a competing factor. There is need to protect individual work and publishers from those who plagiarize to avoid the gains achieved so far and chaos and confusion. The world has turned to capitalism and competition for resources and fame. Plagiarism has become more alive in this century and its a moral and legal matter that is challenging every society. The academic world has been transformed to research and analysis and students excel only after writing essays, papers, thesis and publication making plagiarism a great threat. The new form of plagiarism is not for economic and popularity gain but for academic success and it a vice in all learning institutions. There has been so many ideas presented in all academic fields and with technological advancement plagiarism is easy and appealing today than before. There is no limit to the destruction that plagiarism has done economically, politically, socially, emotionally and often leads to enemity, wars and legal disputes. Today in music and art industry plagiarism is a quick fix to fame and riches. Time as a resource today is more precious than ever and people are willing to take shortcuts and achiev e goals within a short time. There is a lot involved in research, organization and tests in order to present work that is credit worthy in all fields of life so there is a trend to take shortcuts. Today there is unwritten policy of publish or perish in universities and so lecturers are likely to redo an old idea thus self -plagiarism. The internet has come of age and information is available all over the web for all disciplines and this is enticing to those who want to plagiarize. There is a demand for innovation, art, music, news and economic benefits are too good attracting the real and fake at the same time. Types of Plagiarism Plagiarism can either be intentional or accidental but the form and modes it takes vary a lot based on the situation. There is concern about academic plagiarism but there is a wide range from the unknown to the known , the written and the spoken and just like theft its trends and forms has no limits. The common one in research are taking some presented idea from a pool of knowledge and presenting it for credit. When one recycles and old concept or idea its self- plagiarism and the copy paste computer technology is a monster that propagates plagiarism. There is a pool of knowledge in all fields and research is ongoing in all parts of the world so plagiarism can arise unknowingly when there is agreement on the same concept and ideology. 14 Seven sons of a Jewish high priest named Sceva were doing this.15 But the evil spirit answered them, Jesus I know, and Paul I recognize, but who are you? 16 And the man in whom was the evil spirit leaped on them, mastered all of them and overpowered them, so that they fled out of that house naked and wounded.[2] This is spiritual plagiarism as people assume the position of Paul and Jesus. Percentage of College Students Admitting to Selected Cheating Behaviors, 1963 and 1993[3] Tests/Examinations 1963 1993 Copied from another student 26% 52% Helped another student cheat 23% 37% Used crib notes 16 % 27% Written Work Copied material without footnoting 49% 54% Plagiarized 30% 26% Falsified a bibliography 38% 29% Turned in work done by another 29% 14% Collaborated on assignments requiring individual work 11% 49% The use of plagiarism has been on the rise just and taking new modes. This research data information show that the percentages have almost doubled in the thirty years. This trend means that in the next century plagiarism will be at level institutions and schools will find overwhelming. There is a great danger for academic and research advancement from plagiarism and there is a wake -up call. The reason for this paper This paper is to demonstrate that I have a clear knowledge of plagiarism and Calvin Theological Seminary rule on plagiarism. I posted this in my paper as a case study and after using the name of the person publishing this information I assumed this is not taking credit or plagiarism. I pledge i will not plagiarize again and action will be taken against me in future as per Calvin Theological Seminary statutes on plagiarism. Max Brewer in his 1907 book Der Deutsche Christus (The German Christ) During the First and Second World Wars, German Protestant leaders used the writings of Luther to support the cause of German nationalism On the 450th anniversary of Luthers birth, which fell only a few months after the Nazi Party began its seizure of power in 1933, celebrations were conducted on a large scale by both the Protestant Churches and the Nazi Party. .At a celebration in Kà ¶nigsberg, Erich Koch, at that time the Gauleiter of East Prussia, made a speech in which he, among other things, compared Adolf Hitler with Martin Luther and claimed that the Nazis fought with Luthers spirit. Such a speech might be dismissed as mere propaganda, but, as Steigmann-Gall points out: Contemporaries regarded Koch as a bona fide Christian who had attained his position [as the elected president of a provincial Church synod] through a genuine commitment to Protestantism and its institutions. Even so, Steigmann-Gall states that the Nazis were not a Christian movement. The prominent Protestant theologian Karl Barth, in1939 stated that the writings of Martin Luther were used by the Nazis to glorify both the State and state absolutism: The German people suffer under his error of the relationship between the law and the bible, between secular and spiritual power, in which Luther divided the temporal State from the inward state, focusing instead on spiritual matters, thus limiting the ability of the individual or the church to question the actions of the State, which was seen as a God-ordained instrument. Effects of plagiarism Plagiarism affects the individual and the society and the effects can be long lasting and devastating. The person involved will lose trustworthy, moral, academic and social standing. This becomes worse when the person is taken to court or loose license of practice and financial loses. Those in the schools are expelled and many years of study and research go to waste. Plagiarism affects just like theft can be too cruel with years of suffering and regret. In the world today there are people that have lost positions of power and authority and careers destroyed. In the society plagiarism can result to financial loses and as companies and jobs are affected, court cases and warring parties, and threatening social standing. Reasons for plagiarism Ignorance and carelessness is the major sources of plagiarism. Ignorance and carelessness are also the major sources of the excuse from students who are caught plagiarizing. Even in cases where there are established writers, politicians, and academics have been caught plagiarizing the most common reason is confusion in my notes.[4] There is always a reason behind every action good or bad and so people have different reasons to justify plagiarism. The world living in the era of quick fix and people have no time to invest in hard work as time becomes the most valuable resource. A majority of the plagiarism is intentional and by people that are well vast in their fields of knowledge but have little time to carry out a research. The financial and positional gain is attractive and is its good luck adventure that usually goes bad and becomes destructive. There is all information in the Web about anything and this makes plagiarism the easy and quick path to take. The economic trends today h ave forced people to do extra work , juggle between multiple careers , become student workers and so there is little time to invest in school and learning hence plagiarism is a solution. Self-plagiarism is one that can be done unaware after years of publishing and at times its miss-understanding and mistakes of not doing a citation. When people do research and writing they do it without fore knowledge of other people involved in the same work so plagiarism out of ignorance may not justify judgement and condemnation. There is a blame and counter by teachers and students but the bottom line is plagiarism is plagiarism. Today learning is intensive and cumbersome and most students had find it hard to match the pace and hence plagiarism. Conclusion Although we are teaching academic writing we cannot discount the cultural context. It invigorates the writing because is connected to the writers identity informing the writers voice -and yes it can be incorporated in to academic writing. Free writing should allow cultural context to serve as the true and comfortable setting in which second language students could get started in the process of writing a personal essay or research paper. [5] When people do research and writing they do it in their character and nature and the work cannot be separate from themselves. All people live and work in communities that influence their thinking and actions and so when writing in their true self their work will be more original. When writing from second language and culture, under strict guidelines and limits and the objective of teaching and learning is defeated by just fulfilling the purpose. There is a reason to demystify plagiarism by teaching students those engaging in research and writing a bout it, and the basic academic law of education is character. There is need for continuous and genuine conversation by all institutions on the standards, punishment, and modes of plagiarism as new method and techniques evolve with technological advancement. Schools and universities need to engage parents and guardians since plagiarism is vice that is academic and moral. The question of self-plagiarism and miss-use of resources, or a typology and its punishment will be there today and as long as there is writing and research. The new trends in plagiarism and its rise is a challenge to all institutions of learning and there is need to teach plagiarism and good academic morals as a mission. Bibliography Blum, Susan D. My Word ! ,New York :Cornell University Press, 2009. Lathrop, Ann, and Kathleen Foss. Student Cheating and Plagiarism in the Internet Era: A Wake-Up Call: A Wake-Up Call. Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited, 2000. .eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), EBSCOhost (accessed March 9, 2017). Harris, Robert A. The Plagiarism, Handbook Los Angelas: Pyrczack publishing, 2001. Desena, Laura H. Preventing Plagiarism, Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English, 2007 [1] Blum, Susan D. My Word ! New York (Cornell University Press, 2009)12-13 [2] Acts 19: 14-16 (ESV) [3] Lathrop, Ann, and Kathleen Foss. Student Cheating and Plagiarism in the Internet Era: A Wake-Up Call: A Wake-Up Call. Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited, 2000. .eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), EBSCOhost (accessed March 9, 2017). [4] Harris, Robert A. The Plagiarism Handbook ( Los Angelas: Pyrczack publishing, 2001) ,23 [5] Desena, Laura H. Preventing Plagiarism (Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English, 2007 ),105.

hamlet Essay -- essays research papers

Hamlet’s soliloquy, â€Å"To be or not to be, that is the question,† found in Act 3, Scene 1, of William Shakespeare’s play Hamlet, is one of the most recognized and famous soliloquies in all of English literature. Hamlet uses this moment alone to ponder what he will do in response to his father’s death. In this statement, Hamlet explores the idea of living and dying and what can be found in death. Is death like a dream while one sleeps? Or do we cease to sleep? Or is it just nothing? These are questions that Hamlet considers while deciding the fate of King Claudius. Hamlet wants to seek revenge on Claudius for killing King Hamlet and for marrying the queen, yet he knows that if he were to kill Claudius, he himself would also be killed. Hamlet’s debate of life versus death makes him question the advantages and disadvantages of existence and whether or not it is right to end his life or that of another. â€Å"To be or not to be† or more simply stated is it better to live or die. During this famous soliloquy, Hamlet wonders whether he should take action against his "sea of troubles" and seek revenge for his father's death or live with the pain of his father's murder. He also wonders that if he were to commit suicide, what could he expect in the afterlife. He questions whether or not suicide is morally right in an otherwise painful world. Hamlet has such grief that he frequently longs for death to end his suffering, but he fears that if he commits...

Child Deve

Observation: Physical (fine Motor) Time: 12:30-3:00 Date: 5/12/12 |Time |Actions |Social group |Language |Task | |12:30 |T. C is sitting at table making a jigsaw picking up|T. C , C1,C2,C3,C4,C5 |T. C>C1 –you help me |Making Jigsaw | | |pieces using pincer grasp | |C1>T.C –Yeah | | | | | |C4>T. C – Me too | | |1: 00 |T. C eats dinner with spoon |T. C , G |none |Eating dinner | |1:30 |T. C helps draw head holding pencil using pincer |T. C , C1 |T.C > C1, C1- Look, Look |Drawing picture | | |grasp |T. C , C2 |C1> T. C –That’s lovely | | |1:45 -2:00 |T. C builds a tower with another child |T. C –C1 |T. C> C1 want to help |Free-play | | | | |C1>T.C -yup | | |2:15 |T. C helps change the page of book using pincer |T. C>G |Read That One |Story-time | | |grasp |T. C>A | | | |2:30 |T. C has Book of her own reading it and is changing|T.C, C1, C2, C3,C4,C5 |None |Storey-time | | |pages using her pincer grasp | | | | |3:00 |T. C picks her coats and z ips it up using pincer |T. C > A |T. C> A- Bye |Home-time | | |grasp | | | |Personal learning: †¢ Whilst doing this observation on T. C I learned how amazing it is that at such a young age a child can hold a pencil and attempt to draw with it. †¢ Also in this observation I learned that the more free-play that children get the more they develop their skills †¢ I also learned that at such a young age of two that a child with some help from another child can put together a jigsaw without adults help. Summary: TC shows in this observation that she can use her pincer grasp very well as she is making jigsaws and is using a pencil.TC also shows that she can use her gramer grasp when she feeds herself with the spoon. Recommendations for T. C: I would recommend that the creche could ask T. C to build something with the blocks or they could ask T. C to try drawing something on her own to challenge her so she can develop more. Reference: Flood, E. (2010). Child Development for students in Ireland. Dublin: Gill&Macmillian Physical development: Checklist – gross Motor. Date: 23/11/12 Time: 11:00- 11:30 |Yes |No |Comment |Date | |Runs safely. Confidence, |( | |T. C plays outside catch, T. C |23/11 | |avoiding obstacles | | |runs down towards caterpillar | | | | | |toy and avoids slide. | |Rides a trike, pushing it along | | |Not in observation |23/11 | |with the feet | | | | | |Walks up and down stairs both |( | |Walked down step to go outside |23/11 | |feet to each step, holding wall | | |one step at a time. | | |Squats with ease. Rises without |( | |Plays sleeping bunny.Squats on |23/11 | |using hands | | |ground when saying â€Å" bunny | | | | | |sleeping but doesn’t sit on | | | | | |ground | | |Can climb up on furniture and |( | |Climbed up slide one foot at a |23/11 | |get down again | | |time.Holding onto rails with | | | | | |both hands going up. | | |Steers tricycle pushing along | | |Not in observation |23/11 | |with feet. | | | | | |Able to manoeuvre large toys |( | |Pushes child along in toy car |23/11 | |with wheels | | |using both hands. | |Loves to pull along toys on | | |Not in observation | | |string | | | | | |Throws small ball over arm |( | |Playing ball game outside passes|23/11 | | | | |to another child. | | |Kicks a large ball |( | |Passes ball to other child |23/11 | Evaluation: The Aim of this observation was to observe TC, a 2 year old girl while she was in a creche setting to get a better understanding of her physical development. I feel that I have achieved this aim very well and that generally TC is meeting her norms of development with her physical development in terms of her gross motor. The gross motor skills are the use of the large muscles in your body.In the yard TC shows that she can run in the yard towards caterpillar toy avoiding the slide. TC also shows that she can climb up on furniture and get back down holding onto rails with both hands. TC also shows she’s meeting the nor ms according to flood when she pushes a child in the toy car around the yard. TC also shows that she can kick a large ball when she picks up the soft ball from the ground and throws it to her friends whilst playing hot ball. When returning inside TC went up the step one foot at a time holding the wall for support according to flood 2010 a child at the age of two should be able to carry these tasks without difficulty to be meeting the norms of development.According to flood at the age of two a child should be able to ride tricycles pushing them along with their feet and to pull toys along with wheels, but these activities were not in my observation so I couldn’t observe that TC could carry out these tasks. In summary I feel like TC is meeting her norms of development in her gross motor skills as she carried out the tasks I set out for her to her full potential. Personal learning: †¢ I learned whilst doing this observation that when you set out tasks for the children that they enjoy them more as they can learn through practice doing them. †¢ I also learned that at such a young age that children have good physical strength eg. TC could push the younger child around in the toy car I also learned that children at this age are aware of the dangers that can hurt them like when TC avoided the slide when going to the caterpillar Recommendations for T. C: †¢ I would recommend that the creche get more Toys in the creche so TC can develop her skills on other things. †¢ I would also recommend that the creche encourages TC more to play with other children. References: Flood. E (2010). Child development for students in Ireland. Dublin: Gill&Macmillian. Piaget, J. (1975). The child's conception of the world. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams. (Originally published 1932). Intellectual development. Observation: narrative. Date: 16/11/12 Time: 11;11:10 T.C is sitting on the couch at the corner with two baby born dolls on her knees; TC is pretending that t he baby born dolls are talking to each other saying â€Å"do you want to play† TC is laughing away to herself and is pretending that the babies are laughing with her. TC keeps playing with the dolls, laughing pretending that the dolls are her own children. TC has just named the babies â€Å"Megan and Rachel† (which are the children on front of her) TC is now sitting on the ground with the one of the babies up at her shoulder saying† Its Ok†. Adults goes over to TC and asks her â€Å"what happened the babies† TC replies to the Adult â€Å"Megan hit her† Adult says back to TC â€Å"the poor baby† and turns to the other baby TC has and says â€Å"That’s Not Nice†. TC laughs at adult saying this and says â€Å"Rachel is ok now† and laughs.TC then puts down the Babies and walks over to the picture board and says â€Å"that’s me† and points to the picture of her on the wall. TC then points to another picture and says to adult â€Å"there is Luke and Lauren†. Adult replies â€Å"Yes it is†. TC then goes over to Luke and Lauren and says and points at wall and says â€Å"that’s you Luke and that is you Lauren. † The Door bell then rings and TC looks at door and shouts â€Å"Mammy† TC looks at adults and Says â€Å"That mammy† Adults Replies â€Å"no that’s Lukes mammy†. TC then says â€Å"silly Me† and TC then shouts over to Luke â€Å"Luke Mammy here†. TC Then Goes back over to the Corner and picks up baby born again. End Of observation. Evaluation:The aim of this observation was to observe TC a two year old girl while she was in the creche setting to get a better understanding of her intellectual development. I feel that I have achieved this aim very well and that generally TC is meeting hers norms of development in terms of her intellectual development. In this observation TC shows empathy for the baby born when â₠¬Å"Rachel† is crying. TC shows affection here when she lifts her up and puts her head on her holder. According to Flood(2010) at this age this is what TC should be doing. TC also shows that she is meeting her norms of intellectual development when she goes over to the pictures on the wall and recognizes herself, Lauren and Luke in the photos. According to Flood (2010) these are the norms she should be reaching.According to Piaget A child at the age of 2 â€Å"is at the per-operational stage and assumes that everyone and everything is like them. Therefore they think everything feels pain and has emotions like them. Tc shows this when she thinks that â€Å"rachel† is crying and is hurt. Summary: This observation shows that Tc is meeting all her norms for her age. Recommendations for TC: †¢ I would recommend that the creche encourages TC to play with other children and to get her interacting with other children so that she is not playing on her own. †¢ I would a lso recommend that the Adults interacts more with TC if they can so that other children will come over and play with her. Personal learning: †¢ I learned that a child at this age can sense emotions and can comfort people who are upset. I also learned that children of this age can are in a little world of their own and just keep themselves amused by talking to themselves †¢ I also learned that children can remember and recognize different people that they might see in a picture. References: Flood, E. (2010). Child Development for students in Ireland . Dublin: Gill&macmillianPiaget, J. (1975). The child's conception of the world. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams. (Originally published 1932). Language development – precoded (playing play dough) date: 23/11 Time: 20:00-2:10 |Keys |TC(target child C(Child C1(Child 1 A(Adult 1 | |TC(C |This yours? TC doesn’t get an answer of C) | |TC(A |Harry here | |TC(A |Can I play with harry? | |A(TC |Yes | |A(TC |Do you want me t o break that up? | |TC(A |yea | |A(TC |What you making | |TC(A |It for mammy | |A(TC |Good girl | |TC(A |Harry going to sit here |TC(A |There Harry (do-do) | |C1(TC |What you making | |C(C1 |Think she making pancakes | |C(TC |Is it pancakes | |TC(C |I need that | |C(TC |Ok | |C(TC |Shhh† A† on the phone | |TC(C |OK | |TC(C |I need that | |C(TC |Here | |TC(C |Thank you | |C(TC |You’re welcome. | End of observations. Child Initials: TC Age: 2 Sex: female Date: 3/12 time: 10:55-11:03 Setting: creche Observation: social development Min |Activity |Language record |Task |Social | |1 |Sitting in a circle sing singing |TC(adult – do ring-a-ring-a-Rosie |Group time |Group | | |nursery rhymes | | | | |2 |Sitting in a circle sing singing |A(TC ready |Group time |Group | | |nursery rhymes | | | | |3 |Sitting in a circle sing singing |A-TC-1, 2,3,4,5 Once I got a fish alive†¦ Group time |Group | | |nursery rhymes | | | | |4 |Sitting in a circle sing sin ging |Singing songs with group |Group time |Group | | |nursery rhymes | | | | |5 |Sitting in a circle sing singing |A(TC –ready |Group time |Group | | |nursery rhymes |TC nods head | | | |6 |Sitting in a circle sing singing |TC singing row-row |Group time |Group | | |nursery rhymes | | | | |7 |Sitting in circle singing santy |A(TC –what you want to sing? |Group time |Group | | |coming to town |TC- santy | | | |8 |Break |TC(G – Its break time |Group time |Group | Evaluation: The Aim of this observation was to observe TC, a two year old girl every minute for eight minutes while she was doing group time in a creche setting.I carried out this observation to get a better understanding of her social development. I feel that I have achieved this aim very well and that TC is meeting her norms of development with her social development. In this Observation we see that TC is meeting her norms when she responds to the adult when she is asked what she wants to sing, she al so shows that she is meeting her norms when she joins in when an adult sings, so according to flood (2010) as she is doing this she is meeting her norms of development. She is also meeting her norms when she says â€Å"its break time† as according to flood (2010) children at the age of two will ask for food.In this observation these are the only parts of the norms of development in social skills that we could observe, so we don’t know if she has developed any of the other norms as we can not assume she can do these things we have to see a if she is interacting with the group better. Summary: This observation shows that Tc is meeting most of her norms for her age. But I couldnt prove she is meeting them all. Observation: Emotional Development Event sample. Date: 10/12/12 Observation begins: 9:30 observation finished: 2: 30 |No |Time/date/place |Description of incident |Adult involvement |Provoked/un-provoked | |1 |9:00, 10/12 on couches in corner |TC takes toy of child 1.Child |Adult takes toy of TC and says |Un-provoked | | |of room |1 gets upset and cries |â€Å" C1 had that first† and hands | | | | | |toy back to C1 | | |2 |11:00 10/12 preschool room |TC is playing on mat, TC takes |Adult asks TC to give C1 back |Un-provoked | | | |toy of child 1 and wont give it|the toy by saying â€Å" can C1 have| | | | |back |her toy back please† | |3 |11:30 10/12 tables in preschool |TC is at tables doing puzzles, |Adults says to C1 â€Å" give that |Provoked | | |room |child 1 takes a piece of TC’s |piece back to TC that’s for her| | | | |puzzle and TC gets upset |jigsaw† | | |4 |1:00 10/12 table in preschool |TC is having dinner and child 1|Adult asks C1 to stop â€Å"tipping†|Provoked | | |room |is annoying her by tipping her |TC | | | | |on her arm. TC says â€Å"stop† | | | |5 |1:30 10/12 Library space |Child 1 takes book of TC and TC|Adult Asks C1 â€Å"to give her back|Provoked | | |preschool room. | turns to wall and starts |the book† and gives book back | | | | |crying. to TC | | |6 |2:00 10/12 library space |TC then grabs book of child 1 |Adults Takes Book back of TC |Un-provoked | | |preschool room |and wont give book back |and hands to C1 | | |7 |2:30 story-time mat preschool |Child 1 pushes TC out of way so|Adults tells C1 to say â€Å"sorry |provoked | | |room |that she can sit at the front |to Tc† | | | | |of mat. | | | Evaluation: The aim of this observation was to observe TC, a 2 year old girl while she was in the creche setting to get a better understanding of her emotional development. I feel that I have achieved this aim very well and that generally TC is meeting her norms of development in terms of her emotional development.This observation shows that TC is meeting her norms of development as she shows extreme behavioral changes as she takes toys of other children but gets upset when children take things off her. According to flood (2010) this is the w ay a child at the age of two will carry on. This observation also shows that according to flood (2010) a child at the age of two have little concept of sharing this is why TC took the toy off the other child. Flood(2010) also says that children at the age of two doesn’t understand teasing this is why TC gets upset and mad when child 1 is tipping her whilst TC is having her dinner. According to bruner at child at 2 Should be able to â€Å"able to eat with a spoon and fork† TC shows she can do this. Personal Learning: I learned when doing this observation that you have to let children misbehavior for them to learn †¢ I also learned that children shouldn’t be put near another child that may upset or cause conflict with them. †¢ I also learned that you can sort out conflict that happens between children easily and as soon as it occurs. Recommendations for TC: I would recommend that the adults keep TC away from C1 if they keep getting into situations were t hey are annoying eachother. References: Flood, E. (2010). Child Development for students in Ireland . Dublin: Gill&macmillian |Keys |TC – target child, A- adult G-group C- other child | |A(TC |Are uses ready? |G(A |Yes | |TC(A |What that (TC points to glue) | |A(TC |That’s glue | |TC(A |can we use that | |A(TC |yes one minute | |TC(G |Were using glue | |C(TC |Cool what you making | |TC(C |Lambs | |TC(C |What you making | |C(TC |Butterflies | |TC(C |Cool | |TC(G |Look at mine (TC holds up lamb) | |A(TC |That’s lovely | |TC(A |Thanks | |TC(C |I like yours | |C(T.C |I like that colour | |TC(C |Thanks | |TC(C |Luke what you making | |C(TC |Lamb like you | |TC(C |NAP (snap) | |A(G |Use having fun? | |G(A |Yeah | |TC(A |Can I make a butterfly now? |A(TC |Yes course you can | |TC(C |I making butterfly like you | |C(TC |We can be the same | |TC(C |Sure mines pink | |A(TC |When you finish your butterfly we are cleaning up ok | |TC(A |Oktaa | |TC(G |We Have to finish up soon | |G(A |nooooo | |A(G |Its break-time | |TC(A |Can we do it again | |A(TC |Yea later | |A(G |We have to clean up now. end of observation) | Language Development: date: 25/2/13 time: 11:00-11:10 Evaluation: The aim of this observation was to observe TC, A 2 Year old child for 10 minutes in a creche whilst she was taking part in a group activity to get a better understanding of the development of her language from the last time I observed her. I feel that TC has progressed in term of her language skills as she now talking clearer and is using more vocabulary As According to Flood (2010 a child at the age of 2 â€Å"uses 200 or more words. † Flood(2010) also claims that a child at the age of 2 â€Å"constantly pointing out an asking the names of people and objects.TC shows that she is meeting this norm when she asks the adult what the glue is. This also shows that TC has progressed since she was last observed as in the last observation she wasn’t aski ng much questions at all. According to Piaget † the vocabulary of a child is expanded and developed during this as they change from babies to toddlers† Tc shows that she has developed since the last observation as she is having a better conversation in this observation then she was in the last one. According to bowler a child at 2 should â€Å"let people know what they want using words†. TC shows this when she asks adult can she make a butterfly. Personal learning: From doing this observation I learned that children can progress and are always progressing as TC progressed since the last time I observed her. Recommendation for TC: I would recommend that the creche get TC to do more activities like this as in this activity TC was doing lots of interaction with the other children. References: Flood, E. (2010). Child Development for students in Ireland . Dublin: Gill&macmillian Bowler P and Linke P, â€Å"Your Child from One to Ten†. Australian Council for Educ ational Research, Melbourne, Vic. 1996. Piaget, J. , & Inhelder, B. (1973). Memory and intelligence. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Physical development: Checklist – gross Motor.Date:25 /2/13 Time: 11:00- 11:30 | |Yes |No |Comment |Date | |Runs safely. Confidence, |( | |T. C plays outside catch, T. C |23/11 | |avoiding obstacles | | |runs down towards caterpillar | | | | | |toy and avoids slide. | |Rides a trike, pushing it along |( | |TC is playing in the cars with |23/11 | |with the feet | | |the other children in yard. | | |Walks up and down stairs both |( | |Walked down step to go outside |23/11 | |feet to each step, holding wall | | |one step at a time. | | |Squats with ease. Rises without |( | |Plays sleeping bunny.Squats on |23/11 | |using hands | | |ground when saying â€Å" bunny | | | | | |sleeping but doesn’t sit on | | | | | |ground | | |Can climb up on furniture and |( | |Climbed up slide one foot at a |23/11 | |get down again | | |time.Holding onto ra ils with | | | | | |both hands going up. | | |Steers tricycle pushing along |( | |TC is playing in the cars in |23/11 | |with feet. | | |yard. | | |Able to manoeuvre large toys |( | |Pushes child along in toy car |23/11 | |with wheels | | |using both hands. | |Loves to pull along toys on | | |Not in observation | | |string | | | | | |Throws small ball over arm |( | |Playing ball game outside passes|23/11 | | | | |to another child. | | |Kicks a large ball |( | |Passes ball to other child |23/11 | Evaluation:The Aim of this observation was to observe TC, a 2 year old girl while she was in a creche setting doing an outdoor activity to get a better understanding of her physical development to see if she has developed since I last observed her. I feel that I have achieved this aim very well as TC is now meeting all her norms of development with her physical development in terms of her gross motor. The gross motor skills are the use of the large muscles in your body. In the yard TC shows that she can run in the yard towards caterpillar toy avoiding the slide. TC also shows that she can climb up on furniture and get back down holding onto rails with both hands. TC also shows she’s meeting the norms according to flood when she pushes a child in the toy car around the yard.TC also shows that she can kick a large ball when she picks up the soft ball from the ground and throws it to her friends whilst playing hot ball. When returning inside TC went up the step one foot at a time holding the wall for support according to flood 2010 a child at the age of two should be able to carry these tasks without difficulty to be meeting the norms of development. According to flood at the age of two a child should be able to ride tricycles pushing them along with their feet and to pull toys along with wheels, but these activities were not in my observation so I couldn’t observe that TC could carry out these tasks. In summary I feel like TC is meeting her norms of develop ment in her gross motor skills as she carried out the tasks I set out for her to her full potential.TC Also shows that she is meeting her norms as she shows that she can Rides a trike, pushing it along with the feet as according to flood(2010) she should be doing this at the age of 2 Years also TC shows that she is meeting her norms as she shows that she can Steer a tricycle pushing along with feet. Personal learning: †¢ I learned whilst doing this observation that when you set out tasks for the children that they enjoy them more as they can learn through practice doing them. †¢ I also learned that at such a young age those children have good physical strength eg. TC could push the younger child around in the toy car †¢ I also learned that children at this age are aware of the dangers that can hurt them like when TC avoided the slide when going to the caterpillar Recommendations for T. CI Recommend that the creche do more outdoor activities with them so that TC can ke ep developing her norms. References: Flood, E. (2010). Child Development for students in Ireland . Dublin: Gill&macmillian Social development: flow chart- narrative Date:25/2/13 Time: 9:00-12:00 TC entered the creche and went straight over to the table to get toast and juice. TC sat down beside another child and said â€Å"hi† she then turned around to the adult and said â€Å"can I have some toast† The adult replyed â€Å"yes† and handed Tc some Toast. After her toast TC went over to the library counter and sat alongside another child and read a book. TC and the other child were reading the book aloud and swapping book after they had each book read.After the library counter TC went over to the home corner with two other children and pretending to cook them lunch at the kitchen asking â€Å"what would you like for lunch† TC then told the children that this is what her mammy uses to make her dinner. After this TC went over onto the mat and sang nursery rhy mes with all the other children and held hands when going around in the circle. TC then went back over to the table where she was going to have her break and asked the adult could she sit beside Lauren and luke. The adult said she could so she said beside them. TC then asked could she be the helper to give the children out there lunches and the adult let her. TC then went around giving all the children their lunches and talking to them.After Break TC went and got her coat on as she was going outside to do and outdoor activity TC stood in the line beside Lauren holding her hand singing â€Å"if your happy and you know it† song. TC then went outside with the other children and stood against the wall watching the adult demonstrating the activity. TC then got in a line behind the other children and waited her turn to do activity. After Activity was done TC went back inside as all the children were and went over and took a sit beside another child as they were making mother days c ards TC asked all the children † what colours they were using† after the activity as done it was TC home time so she got up of her chair and said â€Å"bye† to everyone and went to the door to go home. (see flow chart) Evaluation:In this observation we see that TC has progressed since the last time that she observed as she in now interacting with the children more. We see this when TC is sitting next to â€Å"Lauren and luke† and she is taking to them in the last social observation TC was mainly just joining in on what the group was doing she wasnt making her own conversation with the children. According to the Piaget a child at the age of 2 should â€Å"Initiate play activities† TC shows she can do this when she join in indoor and outdoor activities. Also according to Piaget a child at the age of two â€Å"Demonstrate personal preferences about toys, food, and activities† TC show she does this when she pretends to make food for the other chil dren.According to bowler a child at 2 should â€Å"2- 3 year olds love simple picture books with familiar things and simple stories. Read aloud to them and talk about the pictures† TC shows that she can do this when she reads the book at library corner. Summary: In this observation it shows that Tc has developed since the last time i observed her. Recommends: I would recommend that the creche workers keep getting TC involved in activity to make her interact even more with the other children. References: Bowler P and Linke P, â€Å"Your Child from One to Ten†. Australian Council for Educational Research, Melbourne, Vic. 1996. Piaget, J. , & Inhelder, B. (1973). Memory and intelligence. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Organizing Agatha Essay

The Enduring Appeal of Agatha Christie is an enthralling essay written precisely and effectively about the powerful author. The introduction to the essay is brief, yet very informative, giving the reader a bit of background information. It refers to popular literature abounds such as Stephen King and Edgar Allen Poe. I personally have never heard of Agatha Christie, therefore the information contained regarding other legends aided in my understanding of how popular and legendary she truly is. In addition to this, the thesis statement is succinct and presents the author’s opinion regarding Agatha Christie’s brilliance clearly. This was very helpful, as I was informed almost immediately as to what I was going to read about. Overall, the introductory paragraph gave me a great ordeal of background information, as well as three concise topics concerning the writing legacy, Agatha Christie, and her writing intelligence. This essay is effectively written as it has a rational flow of ideas and is very cohesive. Each paragraph begins with an enthralling topic sentence, giving myself, the reader, an appealing fact followed by the main idea of the writing. A great example of this can be viewed in the opening sentence of the first body paragraph which reads, â€Å"[n]ext to Sherlock Holmes, Hercule Poiret and Miss Jane Marple are two of the most recognizable detectives in fiction because of their distinctive attributes.† Although this is an engaging topic sentence, the author did not include all of the points he/she wished to include in the actually body paragraph as Ariadne Oliver was excluded. On an opposing note, however, I do feel that points of each body paragraph are not strong enough to fully support the thesis statement. For example, in paragraph one the reader is suddenly bombarded with names of Christie’s characters without an explanation of who they are, or what novels they come f rom. It was slightly confusing for myself as I needed to do a bit of research in order to figure out who Hercule Poirot, Miss Jane Marple, Ariadne Oliver were. Therefore, it would have been more effective if the author had included a bit of brief, background information as this would make for a greater understanding of the body paragraphs and thesis. Similarly, I feel that the arguments of the essay are not in appropriate  order in terms of strength. I believe that the second paragraph should lead the essay as it provides more background knowledge of Agatha’s characters, novels and is an overall stronger argument. Moreover, the second body paragraph needs to be introduced with a more refined topic sentence that reflects upon the thesis of the essay. The thesis states that Agatha Christie engages the audience with her interesting settings, but the topic sentence of this paragraph is, once again, talking about various characters. Also, the supporting arguments in this paragraph are not written in the same order as the introductory sentence, which is an issue that ultimately leads to perplexity. On the contrary, the passage uses connective words which aided in signalling changes and movement in the text.. Aside from the minor glitches, the three body paragraphs work as a unified whole; for example, they contain links between and within all sentences and paragraphs. Basically, it is easy to follow and uses appropriate language to maintain the argument’s focus and to direct the reader. All three of the paragraphs are detailed and legitimate- clearly referring back to each idea throughout the text. For example, in paragraph two of the essay Agatha writes, â€Å"†¦[d]espite their varied locales, the common element that runs through Christie’s novels is the â€Å"closed† society. These worlds are cut off culturally, economically, or physically, as in the case of Ten Little Indians, which is set on an island off the Devon coast.† The author clearly states his/her point and follows this by a strong example of Margaret Christie’s work. Overall, the body paragraphs follow a structural pattern and present ideas in an efficient manner which actually enhance the reading material. Finally, the conclusion does a great job summing up all of the information contained throughout the entire essay. The author begins by restating the thesis and summarizing the three argumentative topics (Christie’s morality, her settings and characters) .The application of Christie’s opinions and morality in comparison today’s society really makes one think about what life would be like if her ‘world of moral certainty’ truly existed. Aside from the structural accuracy, the content and comparison to the present day is what truly captivated myself as a reader and made the essay effective.